About 7 h 45 min · at 30 minutes a day, about 16 days
Estimated from the page count of this edition. Dense books can take longer than the estimate.
About the book
Are there things people should choose not to know? Roger Shattuck examines that question through Western myths and literature, from Adam and Eve to Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein, before turning to the Manhattan Project and genetic engineering. He argues that curiosity and the freedom to investigate carry moral responsibilities, and challenges the celebration of taboo-breaking in the writings of the Marquis de Sade.
Reader notes
Scholarly but conversational, the book moves through close literary readings and historical case studies rather than building a single continuous argument. Its extended, forceful treatment of Sade makes pornography, sexual abuse, and violence substantial subjects; the scientific discussions occupy only part of this work of cultural criticism.
How it reads
Writing style
Academic · Essayistic
Tone
Cerebral · Earnest · Philosophical
Structure
Argumentative
Driven by
Argument · Ideas
Evidence style
Philosophical argument · Research synthesis
Practical orientation
Theoretical
Nonfiction form
Argument criticism · Explanation synthesis
Reading complexity
Writing
3 / 5
Ideas
4 / 5
Structure
3 / 5
Background knowledge
2 / 5
About this profile
Collected’s assessment, not reader ratings. Complexity runs from 1 (least demanding) to 5 (most demanding).
Writing
How much attention the sentences and language require.
Ideas
How much interpretation or abstract reasoning the book asks of you.
Structure
How much you need to keep track of speakers, timelines and connections.
Background knowledge
Prior knowledge needed to follow the book, beyond what it explains.
Emotional intensity
Emotional pressure, from gentle (1) to intense (5). Separate from difficulty.
Themes
Knowledge and truth
Morality
Religion and faith
Technology and society
Content notes
Violence
Strong
Sexual content
Strong
Swearing
None
Substance use
None
Abuse
Strong
Self-harm or suicide
None
Questions readers ask
Is it hard to read?
Somewhat. The prose is scholarly but conversational; the main demand comes from the philosophical ideas and close literary readings. The pace is measured, and the chapters move through case studies rather than developing one continuous argument.
Is it mainly about science and the limits of research?
No. Scientific discussions, including the Manhattan Project and genetic engineering, occupy only part of the work. Shattuck approaches the responsibilities of curiosity largely through Western myths, literature, and cultural criticism.
What strong content should I expect?
Strong discussions of pornography, sexual abuse, and violence are substantial subjects in the extended, forceful treatment of the Marquis de Sade. That discussion is part of Shattuck’s challenge to the celebration of taboo-breaking.
Does it offer practical guidance about what we should choose not to know?
Not really. The approach is theoretical, using philosophical argument, close literary readings, and historical case studies to examine moral responsibility. It suits an interest in debating the limits of inquiry rather than seeking practical instructions.
How long is it?
About 384 pages in the Harcourt Brace 1997 edition. The measured pace and extended literary readings make it a sustained work of cultural criticism.
Which edition is shown here?
Harcourt Brace · 1997 · Paperback. ISBN 9780156005517.
How long does it take to read Forbidden Knowledge?
About 7 hours 45 minutes at 50 pages an hour, based on the 384-page Harcourt Brace edition. Dense books can take longer.
About the author
Roger Shattuck
Roger Shattuck’s literary criticism and intellectual history share a concern with how modern culture tests the limits of art, knowledge, and human responsibility. He connects close attention to form with larger ethical questions, grounding his arguments in particular lives, texts, and cases. His portraits of Rousseau, Satie, Jarry, and Apollinaire in The Banquet Years present modernism as a set of distinct experiments rather than a single movement. Elsewhere, he considers the costs of pursuing knowledge: The Forbidden Experiment examines the suffering behind a case involving a child raised outside ordinary society, while Forbidden Knowledge traces arguments about curiosity and restraint from biblical myth to modern science. His study of Proust shows the same preference for telling particulars, using gestures, jokes, social rituals, and remembered sensations to reveal a novel’s larger design. Across these subjects, Shattuck brings cultural history, close reading, and moral judgment into sustained conversation.